Mayor Lori Lightfoot’s curfew plan that further restricts how late young people can be outside in Chicago passed a City Council committee Friday despite wide-ranging concerns from aldermen over how effective the provisions would be at keeping children safe.
The mayor pitched expanding the curfew to 10 p.m. from 11 p.m. for all days of the week following a teen’s fatal shooting at The Bean in Millennium Park, but the idea has come under scrutiny by tough-on-crime critics and aldermen who claim the proposal reiterates laws on the books that already aren’t enforced by Chicago police.
Advertisement
Still, the council’s public safety committee approved the measure 14-3, sending the ordinance to the full City Council for final consideration next week. Alds. Raymond Lopez, 15th, who has said he will be running for mayor next year, Matthew Martin, 47th, and Roderick Sawyer, 6th, voted no. The hearing comes on the heels of the mayor signing an executive order with the same curfew changes as well as a separate order that Lightfoot imposed on unaccompanied minors being allowed at Millennium Park on weekend nights.
In the discussions leading up to the vote, aldermen across the political spectrum expressed reservations about the usefulness of expanding the curfew one hour for Friday and Saturday nights, among other tweaks. But ultimately, most members decided the amendment was needed.
Advertisement
On the night of May 14, 16-year-old Seandell Holliday was shot near The Bean, allegedly by a 17-year-old. Chicago police said the shooting occurred during an altercation at a time when large groups of young people had gathered at the downtown park in a scene that became chaotic.
“If downtown could be a safe haven for young people, wouldn’t that be fantastic?” asked Ald. Michele Smith, 43rd, which includes the Old Town and Lincoln Park neighborhoods. “But it’s not because for some reason, people have decided to bring their feuds into our city.”
Sign up for The Spin to get the top stories in politics delivered to your inbox weekday afternoons.
If the measure passes the full council, Lightfoot’s changes in the executive order creating a 10 p.m. curfew for minors all days of the week will become permanent unless changed by the council later. That order was declared on an “emergency” basis, the scope of which is decided solely by the mayor, the city’s Law Department said during Friday’s hearing.
The current curfew lays out a 10 p.m. cutoff on weekdays and an 11 p.m. curfew on weekends, both of which apply to those ages 12 to 16. Lightfoot’s executive order and proposed ordinance amendment would make the curfew apply to 17-year-olds as well.
For children under 12, the current curfew is 8:30 p.m. on weekdays and 9 p.m. on Fridays and Saturdays, and the ordinance introduced Friday does not change that.
Issues with the pending curfew shift ranged from more conservative aldermen clamoring for more punishment to progressive members saying the new curfew potentially targets young people of color. Others said they found the tactic impractical at quelling large crowds or reducing violence.
Lopez, a frequent Lightfoot critic, said he worried the policy is already toothless because he found Chicago police’s 364 recorded curfew violations last year to be scant.
Advertisement
“When we talk about having a tool in the toolbox … we don’t use this tool do we?” Lopez said. “Having a tool and using a tool are two different things.”
As of this week, there have been 98 curfew violations documented by Chicago police in 2022, Lt. Michael Kapustianyk said. In 2020, that number was 635. In 2019, the number was 1,804, and in 2018 the number of curfew violations issued was 2,453.
Kapustianyk stressed the Police Department tries to use the curfew to “engage” minors rather than penalize them. Children found in violation of the curfew do not get arrested or charged but are held in custody until a parent, guardian or a “responsible adult” can pick them up.
“We don’t enforce the ordinance other than returning them home and taking custody,” Kapustianyk said. “We don’t enforce the ordinance in a punitive manner to the minor.”
Ald. Emma Mitts, 37th, noted it seemed unrealistic for police to take large crowds of children into custody should they disobey the ordinance. She still voted for the ordinance but not before noting Chicago teens have gathered outside for years and deserve more neighborhood investment.
“I think there should be deeper conversation as to what we’re really doing here and not just putting a Band-Aid on the wound,” Mitts said.
Advertisement
Ald. Anthony Napolitano, 41st, also hedged his support, with his complaint being that the city is not actually punishing parents beyond sending them to an administrative hearing if their child is repeatedly caught past curfew.
On the other end of the political spectrum, Ald. Andre Vasquez Jr., 40th, shared what he said was his experience of police telling him to leave Grant Park and Navy Pier “every weekend” while letting white children stay.
Vasquez, who is not a member of the public safety committee, said he’s worried the pattern could repeat itself as the curfew is expanded and called the mayor’s revision “a poorly thought reactive press piece masquerading as legislation.”
“No kid is going to be like, ‘Oh, thank you for pulling me over officer. It’s 10:02. But I’m just walking home with friends,’ ” Vasquez said. “It’s going to lead to a situation that will then be potentially misread by both parties. Right? If the city operated in common sense, we wouldn’t pay hundreds of millions of dollars in police settlements.”
